Government raises SDLT on small landlords while corporate landlords have a free ride.
As the government raises the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) surcharge for small landlords to a staggering 5%, the system has become blatantly skewed in favour of corporate investors who pay drastically less. With corporate landlords able to purchase multiple properties under non-residential SDLT rates, they’re paying a fraction of the SDLT that small landlords are forced to hand over. This disparity isn’t just unfair—it’s an intentional move that drives small landlords out of the market while filling the pockets of large-scale investors.
To truly understand the disparity, let’s compare two scenarios where both the small and corporate landlord invest £2,000,000. The only difference? The small landlord is buying five properties while the corporate landlord buys a single block of six flats.
SDLT for the Small Landlord
The small landlord, purchasing five properties for a total of £2,000,000, faces residential SDLT rates plus the new 5% surcharge.
1. Standard SDLT Calculation:
- £0 to £250,000 at 0%: £0
- £250,001 to £925,000 at 5%: £675,000 x 5% = £33,750
- £925,001 to £1,500,000 at 10%: £575,000 x 10% = £57,500
- £1,500,001 to £2,000,000 at 12%: £500,000 x 12% = £60,000
Total Standard SDLT (Before Surcharge): £151,250
2. 5% SDLT Surcharge (applied across total purchase price):
- £2,000,000 x 5% = £100,000
Total SDLT for the Small Landlord: £151,250 + £100,000 = £251,250
SDLT for the Corporate Landlord
The corporate landlord, on the other hand, benefits from non-residential SDLT rates simply by purchasing six properties as a single transaction. Here’s the breakdown:
1. Non-Residential SDLT Calculation:
- £0 to £150,000 at 0%: £0
- £150,001 to £250,000 at 2%: £100,000 x 2% = £2,000
- Above £250,000 at 5%: £1,750,000 x 5% = £87,500
Total SDLT for the Corporate Landlord: £2,000 + £87,500 = £89,500
Comparison
Scenario Number of Properties Total Value of Purchase Total SDLT Payable
Small Landlord (5 homes) 5 £2,000,000 £251,250
Corporate Landlord (6 flats) 6 £2,000,000 £89,500
Despite investing the same £2,000,000, the small landlord is forced to pay £251,250 in SDLT—nearly three times more than the corporate landlord, who pays just £89,500. This difference of £161,750 highlights how the SDLT system is rigged in favour of large-scale investors at the expense of small landlords.
The Disparity Magnified: When Corporate Landlords Scale Up
The inequality only grows as corporate landlords scale up their investments. Imagine a scenario where a corporate landlord purchases 10 blocks of flats, each worth £2,000,000, while 10 individual small landlords each buy properties worth £2,000,000.
SDLT for 10 Small Landlords (Each Buying Properties Worth £2,000,000)
Each small landlord, buying properties worth £2,000,000, would face the same SDLT bill of £251,250.
Total SDLT for 10 Small Landlords: £251,250 x 10 = £2,512,500
SDLT for the Corporate Landlord (Buying 10 Blocks of Flats Worth £20,000,000)
The corporate landlord, buying all properties in a single transaction for £20,000,000, benefits from non-residential SDLT rates:
1. Non-Residential SDLT Calculation:
- £0 to £150,000 at 0%: £0
- £150,001 to £250,000 at 2%: £100,000 x 2% = £2,000
- Above £250,000 at 5%: £19,750,000 x 5% = £987,500
Total SDLT for the Corporate Landlord: £2,000 + £987,500 = £989,500
Comparison Proves Inequality
Scenario Number of Properties Total Value of Purchase Total SDLT Payable
10 Small Landlords 50 homes (5 each) £20,000,000 £2,512,500
Corporate Landlord 10 blocks of flats £20,000,000 £989,500
In this scenario, the 10 small landlords are forced to pay a combined SDLT of £2,512,500, while the corporate landlord pays just £989,500—a shocking difference of £1,523,000. The message is clear: the SDLT system is set up to punish small landlords and reward corporate investors with massive savings.
Why This Matters: Tenants Suffer, Too
This SDLT disparity has far-reaching consequences, affecting not just landlords but tenants as well. Small landlords offer unique rental options, often tailored to local needs, while large corporate landlords are motivated primarily by profit. As small landlords are driven out, tenants lose affordable options and find themselves subject to higher rents, less choice, and more rigid rental terms.
The System Needs Urgent Reform
With the new 5% SDLT surcharge, the government has effectively handed corporate landlords a significant advantage. This rigged system will push small landlords out of the market, concentrating power in the hands of large investors and further destabilising the rental market.
If the government is serious about supporting affordable housing and stable rental markets, it’s time to:
- Reduce SDLT rates for small landlords to promote fair competition.
- Reassess the 5% surcharge for landlords with modest portfolios to prevent the landlord exodus.
- Level the SDLT playing field by offering similar relief for small landlords as those available to corporate buyers.